Excerpts From:
The Chrysalis Age: A Handbook for Spiritual and Global Transformation in the New Millennium
Transformation and Transcendence of the Self: What is
Spirituality?
Before we continue to explore the different aspects of
the world it will be useful to pause and define both the idea of spirituality
and the Spiritual worldview.
One of the central
themes of this book is that we need to not only recognize that wider worldviews
are available to us, but that we must transcend our current worldviews for
these deeper ways of knowing if we are to have any hope of avoiding the various
dangers that our current ways of perceiving are creating in the world. Therefore, even if we are able to supplant
the Postmodern,
Modern, and
Traditional worldviews with an Integral worldview on individual and collective levels,
we will still have Spiritual worldviews waiting to be discovered and passed
into.
“Spirit or God or Highest Reality is the phenomenon
that allows us to transcend the human tendency to act out on others the pain
that has been acted upon us and thus to break the ‘repetition compulsion.’ To speak of that capacity to transcend and
break the repetition compulsion and become embodiments of generosity and love
and goodness is to talk about Spirit.
Our meaning in life comes from being embodiments of that Spirit,
elements of the transcendent consciousness of the universe as it moves to
actualize goodness and beauty.”
Michael Lerner, Spirit Matters, p. 7
“When appearances and names are put away and all
discrimination ceases, that which remains is the true and essential nature of
things and, as nothing can be predicated as to the nature of essence, it is
called the “Suchness” of Reality. This
universal, undifferentiated, inscrutable Suchness is the only Reality… and when
all things are understood in full agreement with it, one is in possession of
Perfect Knowledge.”
Buddhist Lankavatata Sutra 83
“Beyond the sense is the mind, beyond the mind is the
intellect, higher than the intellect is the Great Atman [Soul], higher than the
Great Atman is the Unmanifest. Beyond
the Unmanifest is the Person, all-prevading, and imperceptible.”
Katha Upanishad, 2.3.7-8
“Divinity is that which was there before the appearance
of heaven and earth, and which gives form to them; that which surpasses the yin
and the yang, yet has the quality of them.
This Divinity is thus the absolute existence, governing the entire
universe of heaven and earth, yet at the same time, it dwells within all
things, where it is called spirit; omnipresent within human beings, it is
called mind…. Itself without form, it is Divinity which nurtures things with
form.”
Shinto, Kanetomo Yoshida, An Outline of Shinto, quoted from World Scripture, The International Religious Foundation, p. 62
Stars are the silent children of creation; sparkling
miniature suns, swimming in ebony. When
I was a young boy, growing up in rural Michigan, it was my responsibility to
take the dogs out for their nightly walk.
More often than not the dogs would run off down the dirt road we lived
on in search of some faint olfactory treasure that I had no hope of
sensing. The road went on for a mile or
more of wooded darkness, our house being the last small signpost of
civilization. I would run through the
pitch black night hoping not to trip and fall, knowing that the dogs could hear
me as well as they could see me, though I could gain no apprehension of them
until stumbling upon them in a rush.
Finally bending their desires to my will, we’d walk back toward the
house. As we walked I would stare up
through the branches of the trees at the glowing mass of stars that blanket the
country night. An avid fan of science
fiction and Carl Sagan’s Cosmos, I knew that there were “billions and billions”
of stars and even as many galaxies filling an unimaginably unfillable
universe. I knew that I could not fathom
the expansiveness and depth of the cosmos, but walking beneath the mantle of
distant suns, the dogs licking my hands, I would stare up into the face of
infinity and try none-the-less. A
feeling would wash over me, slight, and nearly imperceptible. A feeling I did not label at the time, but
that I later came to think of as spiritual.
It was not a profound mystic experience of union with the universe,
simply a deep sense of connection with everything. A feeling that, while I was an
infinitesimally small part of the cosmos, I was an important part, because I
was aware that I was part of it. By the
time I reached the front steps, the notion had faded, but the sense of it continued
to cling to me.
Nearly everyone has had an experience they would describe
as spiritual, like those I encountered walking the dogs on star-filled
nights. Like most people, for many
years, I thought of myself as spiritual without ever really knowing what I
meant by the word. It was only when I
began reading the sacred texts of the world’s wisdom traditions and the
writings of modern transpersonal psychologists that I began to have an inkling
of what I meant by spirituality. And
this inkling only grew into an understanding when I began a regular practice of
meditation. And so, today I have a
simple definition of what I mean when I use the word spiritual. To me, the word spiritual implies a direct
realization of the numinous or the Divine, the apprehension on some level of Spirit as the Ground of all Being. It denotes a shift of our normal way of
“seeing” the world and a transcendence of our separate sense of ego-self for a
wider grasp of reality. It is an
experience, on one level or another, of the Divine, or Spirit, as an
inseparable wholeness, manifesting as the entire kosmos, moment by moment, in a
timeless now. Not surprisingly, it is an
explicitly mystic worldview. As theologian
Paul Tillich pointed out, mysticism “plunges directly into the ground of being
and meaning, and leaves the concrete, the world of finite values and meanings,
behind.”[i] It does not forget this concrete world, but
transcends it. In its highest form, is
an experience of the nondual awareness of the singularity of the universe found
most clearly in the superlative practices of the Advaita Vedanta and Buddhist paths.
By consequence, I define spirituality as a path or practice that leads
to a spiritual awareness, such as those mystic paths that are the revelatory
core of all the major religions.
Psychologist Roger Walsh explains that: “The ultimate aim of spiritual
practices is awakening; that is, to know our true Self and our relationship to
the sacred. However, spiritual practices
also offer numerous other gifts along the way….Gradually, the heart begins to
open, fear and anger melt, greed and jealousy dwindle, happiness and joy grow,
love flowers, peace replaces agitation, concern for others blossoms, wisdom
matures, and both psychological and physical health improve.”[ii]
These brief definitions of Spirit and spirituality are by no means exhaustive,
but this is the way I will use these words throughout the book. Do not worry if these definitions are not
immediately clear to you, they will be returned to and explored in more depth
later on. And for absolute clarity, I am
not claiming any great spiritual realization on my part. I am not enlightened or anything close to
it. I am merely acknowledging that there
are worldviews wider and deeper than my own and trying to provide a clear
explanation of why we need them, what they look like, and how we might all
attain them.
Stages
of Transpersonal/Spiritual Development
The field of study
that examines the spiritual states of consciousness and stages of development
is called transpersonal psychology. The
spiritual stages of development are the ultimate reaches of our human potential
and only by becoming aware of them and studying them we can eventually attain
them.
“Transpersonal
experiences
may be defined as experiences in which the sense of identity or self extends
beyond (trans) the individual or
personal to encompass wider aspects of humankind, life, psyche, and cosmos. Transpersonal disciplines study
transpersonal experiences and related phenomena. Practitioners seek to expand the scope of
their disciplines to include the study of transpersonal phenomena and to bring
their particular disciplinary expertise to this study. Transpersonal Psychology is the psychological study of
transpersonal experiences and their correlates.
These correlates include the nature, varieties, causes, and effects of
transpersonal experiences and development as well as the psychologies,
philosophies, disciplines, arts, cultures, life-styles, reactions, and
religions that are inspired by them, or that seek to induce, express, apply, or
understand them.”
Roger Walsh and Frances Vaughn, Paths
Beyond Ego, p.3
Integral philosopher Ken Wilber has accomplished another, more extensive,
systematic mapping of worldviews than we have explored thus far. Synthesizing Western and Eastern philosophy, developmental
psychology, cultural anthropology, evolutionary theory, systems theory, and the
mystic writings of the world’s great wisdom traditions, Wilber has managed to
create a truly holistic map of reality.
With this map he has successfully included the truths, but not the
errors (or so he hopes), of nearly all the modes of understanding that humanity
has created. The most important aspect
of Wilber’s work, in my opinion, is that he has managed to convincingly explore
the stages of transpersonal development that succeed the primarily personal
stages. These are the spiritual stages
of development described by mystics of all persuasions.
The
scientific study of the spiritual stages of human development is known as
transpersonal psychology. Wilber is not the only researcher to investigate the
Spiritual or transpersonal stages of development. Beginning with William James there is a long
line of psychologists and philosophers who have explored the further reaches of
human nature. These include, in no
particular order, Richard Maurice Bucke, Evelyn Underhill, Aldous Huxley, Stanislav Grof, Michael Washburn,
Jenny Wade, Roger Walsh, Frances Vaughn, and Sri Aurobindo. However, as much as I respect and admire the
work of all these individuals, it is precisely because Wilber attempts to
integrate the best all of them into his system that I believe it is not only
the most comprehensive, but the one best suited for discussing the spiritual
stages of development.
Wilber’s transpersonal spectrum of
consciousness adds four distinct stages to the other systems of personal
development, which he incorporates into his system as well. Briefly, the first is the Psychic level, or nature mysticism, where the unity
with all living things is perceived and lived.
This is also the level where actual psychic events may be
experienced. The Hindu tradition refers
to this as the siddhas, which distract many spiritual aspirants from ultimate
realization. The next level is the Subtle, or deity mysticism,
where one experiences unity with one’s primal archetypes, or one’s personal
god. A near-death experience is one
example of this, but a sustained realization at this level often includes experiences
of interior illuminations and a deep unity with not just all life (or the gross
level) but the actual mechanisms that support life, the subtle forms, or the
laws of the universe if you will. The
third stage is the Causal; unity with the
Witness, and the emptiness, or void, from which all arises. This stage is what is generally considered
enlightenment, but there is a final stage: the Nondual or Unity Consciousness stage, in which
identification with even the Witness, the void, with emptiness, is transcended
and there is simply unity, simply Spirit.
There is no subject and no object, there is simply All. Spirit as Spirit. All of these stages are covered in more
detail later.
Wilber’s transpersonal stages of
consciousness are based on a cross-cultural study of the world’s mystic
traditions as well as modern consciousness research. While there are many scientists attempting to
explain the spiritual experience as a neurological event, trying to pinpoint a
“God Module” within the brain, these conjectures miss the point.[iii] All
experiences are neurological events in that we experience them
neurologically. It is not surprising
that a long-term practitioner of meditation will display a significantly
different EEG pattern, or that areas of their brain not normally used will be
highlighted in an
There
is a strong correlation between the stages of personal and spiritual
development and the stages of sociocultural development. Humans pass through individual stages of
development and as societies we seem to pass through these very same stages
played out on a larger fashion. And just
as each worldview on the personal level successively embraces a wider
perspective, a deeper understanding of the universe, so too do the larger
stages that society in general moves through.
It is important to note that each successive stage does not abandon the
worldview of the previous stage, but instead transcends it, leaving the
individual, or the society, with a successively wider perspective. Different
individuals will always be at different stages throughout a society, as the
work of Ray and Anderson illustrates, but at most times a single
worldview will dominate a society.
Currently our Western society is dominated by the Modern worldview, which tends to have a low regard
for the very notion of religion, much less the idea of a transcendent
spirituality. As our society moves
slowly toward a more Integral worldview this situation will hopefully change
in some radical and significant ways.
[i] Paul Tillich, The
Courage to Be, p.186.
[ii] Roger Walsch, Essential Spirituality, p. 4
[iii] Sharon Begley, “Religion and the Brain,” Newsweek, May 14, 2001.
.